The problem

Your scenarios work until they don't.

Someone on the team built a Make.com scenario six months ago. It worked in testing. It ran fine for a few weeks. Then it started failing. Silently. No alerts. No error messages anyone noticed. Just orders going unprocessed, leads going unrouted, and data going missing.

This is the most common pattern I see. Make.com is a genuinely powerful platform, but power without architecture creates fragility. Scenarios without error paths break. Scenarios without logging fail invisibly. Scenarios built for the happy path choke on the first unexpected input.

What I do

Production-grade scenarios, not prototypes.

I design Make.com scenarios the way software should be built: with error handling, retry logic, data validation, and monitoring from the start. Not bolted on after the first failure.

Every scenario I build includes named error routes that catch failures and notify the right person. Data is validated before it moves between modules. Rate limits are respected. Webhooks are verified. The scenario logs what it does so you can audit it later.

If you need Make.com to talk to systems that don't have a native module (a bespoke API, an internal tool, a legacy database) I build custom HTTP integrations. If the logic is too complex for Make.com alone, I'll recommend a hybrid approach using Make.com alongside n8n or custom code where it makes sense.

What you get

Automations you can trust to run.

  • Production-ready Make.com scenarios with error handling on every path
  • Monitoring and alerting so you know when something needs attention
  • Data validation to catch bad inputs before they cause downstream problems
  • Written documentation for each scenario: what it does, how it works, how to troubleshoot
  • Training session for your team covering day-to-day operation and common fixes
  • 30-day support window after handover

FAQ

Common questions before we start.

Why Make.com over Zapier?

Make.com handles complex branching, error paths, and data manipulation that Zapier struggles with. It's also significantly cheaper at scale. For simple two-step automations, Zapier is fine. For anything with conditions, loops, or multiple branches, Make.com is the better tool.

Can you fix scenarios that keep breaking?

Yes, that's a large part of what I do. Most broken scenarios fail because they don't handle edge cases: missing fields, API rate limits, unexpected data formats. I'll audit your existing scenarios, identify the failure points, and rebuild them with proper error handling.

Do you build from scratch or fix existing setups?

Both. Some clients need a clean build. Others have working scenarios that need hardening. I'll assess what you have and recommend the most cost-effective route. Sometimes a rebuild is faster than patching.

What integrations do you commonly build?

CRM to email platform, form submissions to multiple systems, invoice processing, lead routing, document generation, Slack or Teams notifications from business events, and data sync between tools that don't natively talk to each other. If two systems have an API, they can be connected.

Can you train my team on Make.com?

Yes. Every engagement includes a handover session. If your team needs to maintain or modify the scenarios, I'll walk them through the logic, the error handling, and how to troubleshoot common issues. I also leave written documentation.